Author: Hrenciuc, Daniel
Year: 2006
Title: Integrarea Minorităţilor naţionale din Bucovina în Regatul României mari (1918-1928) Unele consideraţii
Journal: Codrul Cosminului
Issue: 12
Pages: 159-177.
Language: Romanian
Keywords: General, history, assimilation, integration, ethnic identity, politics, war
Abstract(RO)(EN): Revenirea provinciilor la Regatul României Mari, în contextul evenimentelor anului 1918, a pus statul român în faţa unor probleme greu de anticipat: existenţa unui procent semnificativ de comunităţi etnice, populaţiile alogene depăşind numeric în spaţiul Bucovinei istorice populaţia românească autohtonă. În Bucovina istorică procentul minoritarilor era superior românilor (între 52% şi 55% revenind alogenilor, conform unor surse diferite), situaţie statistică radical schimbată de momentul anexării la Austria (1774). Perspectiva integraţionistă efectiv centralizatoare a guvernărilor naţional-liberale, care s-au succedat direct sau indirect la conducerea României Mari între 1918 şi 1928 a implicat (re) impunerea identitarismului, disimulat în noua ofensivă culturală în structurile specifice ale statului românesc, provocând reacţiile comunităţilor etnice din Bucovina.

In the historic Bukovina the percentage of the minorities was superior tot hat of Romanian (52%-55%), so that the Romanian authorities found it difficult to handle things. These problems were only noticed after the enthusiasm of the union to Romania and the appearance of a large set of economic, social, political land spiritual circumstances. The Union had been done but the process of unification was only beginning. The integrational centralizing perspective of the National-Liberal governments that took part either directly or indirectly to leading Great Romanian between 1918-1928 - allowed the manifestation of the identity, hidden in the new cultural assault on the state structures and making the ethnic communities react. The alternative solutions proposed by some political leaders collude be solved due to an interne land external favorable context so that the formula of the unconditional union prevailed over the conditioned union (which was evoked by Iuliu Maniu and had its partisans in Bukovina, too) foot the benefit of the entire Romanian nation. The former Kingdom didn't have any experience in managing the motive's problems and The National Liberal Party immediately voted for a centralization formula and the liquidation of the autonomy and regional leadership, which had negative effects on the ethnical communities.
URL: http://buktolerance.com.ua/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/11-danielhrenciuc.pdf